When I lived in London, I used to go Pike fishing on a backwater of the Thames at Sunbury. On several occasions I saw Salmon leaping. I also heard of one Pike angler actually landing 2 Salmon - I do not know what bait/lure was used. Do any of the London and SE anglers know if the Salmon numbers in the Thames are worth targetting yet, or in fact heard of any more captures? and if so why do we never hear about them?
As far as I know '97 and '99 were the last two years that any salmon were officially recorded from the Thames. I don't know for certain about the last couple of years though. Rod effort had declined from about 350 angler days in '99 to much less than a hundred now.
When I lived in London I remember a fish being caught from the surrey docks in the early '90s by a Pike Angler. There were a few people who fished for the Thames salmon quite seriously. Perhaps one of them might be able to provide far more info and relate the decline in catches to the fate of the stiocking programme..
In terms of migratory fish sea trout perhaps provide a more interesting option in the Thames area. They are to be found in a number of tributaries and rivers that share the same estuary from the Medway as far upstream as the Loddon.
I've just received this message from Paul Collins one of the few anglers who fished seriously for Thames salmon in the '80s and 90's. Thought people might find it interesting:
"Tom, thanks for your interest,and apologies for the delay in replying. Between say 1985-1999 salmon fishing on the thames was not a futile exersize but wasn't exactly productive either.I caught my first one from sunbury weir on my first ever attempt ,on a float fished shrimp.I've had 5 in total now and 2 of them were caught on the same day.This was fishing probably 2 tides a week in the season July-September for 10 years.The thing that kept us going was the fact that you would always see a few fish jumping and rolling etc.Unfortunately since the late 90's the fish just havn't been there.The man with the knowledge and the opportunity to observe is Mike Peters.He's had approaching 50 Thames salmon and is an almost permanent fixture on the bankside at the right time.No fish seen for some years.It's such a shame because all the fish ladders etc. are now complete right up to the kennet I understand that so far it's cost over a million pounds for every rod caught salmon. and now there are none to be caught."
Our correspondent fears than an ambitious project may be running out of time By Brian Clarke THERE can be very few anglers — indeed, there can be very few folk of any persuasion — who have not been aware of the heroic attempt to bring salmon back to the Thames. This project, set up 27 years ago, was not conceived for anglers but as a means of demonstrating that the capital’s river, for a century and a half a running sewer, was more or less clean again. What better way to demonstrate it, the water authorities, the tourist industry and London’s city burghers decided, than to have salmon leaping and forging past Westminster and salmon anglers coming from all over Britain to catch them?
Their plan was to put immature fish from elsewhere into the Thames, have these fish go to sea the way all salmon do and then return as big fish ready to spawn naturally, kick-starting a self-sustaining stock.
Alas, the news is not good. Last year turned out to be the first since the Thames Salmon Rehabilitation Scheme was launched in 1979 when not a single fish was counted in from the sea. Just as disappointing, no salmon, not even in the heady days of the 1980s and 1990s, when sometimes hundreds of fish a year were returning and anglers were catching them regularly, has been known for certain to spawn in the river. Every returning fish trapped so far has been one previously stocked. Now, 27 years and £6 million later, the project is not dead, but its future is in the balance.
“It’s been an incredibly disappointing year,” Darryl Clifton-Dey, who runs the project for the Environment Agency (EA), said. “There is still time for a turnaround. In 2003 we thought we were getting there. We tracked fish right back to the River Kennet, a tributary of the Thames where we had put them in as juveniles. But we don’t know if they actually did the business.”
If they did spawn, Clifton-Dey said, their progeny should be in from the sea this year. “But if they didn’t, and if we haven’t had a successful spawning by April 2009, when the five-year programme ends, we’ll have to look again. We’ll have to determine whether there’s a future for salmon in the Thames.”
In medieval times, tens of thousands of salmon ran the river every year, but the growth of the capital and mounting pollution steadily choked them off. No salmon had been seen in the Thames for 140 years when, on November 13, 1974 a single stray salmon from another river was found dead. After that, the odd stray salmon was seen every year. Five years on, the Thames Water Authority (TWA) and others came up with the restocking plan.
The hope was that the young fish put in would imprint on the river, go out to the feeding grounds off the Faeroe Isles or Greenland and come back big, vibrant, silver and sexually mature a year or so later. They would hopefully spawn in the river, their progeny would repeat the cycle, the artificial stocking could be phased out — and bingo.
Tens of thousands of juvenile salmon have been released every year since. The Thames Salmon Trust, a charity part resourced and funded by anglers, embarked on a programme that was to result in 39 fish passes being built into the weirs and other obstacles between the lower Thames, where spawning potential was not good, and the middle reaches of the Kennet.
The numbers of returning fish increased. The TWA offered a prize for the first salmon angler to land an authenticated fish on rod and line — and on August 23, 1983, Russell Doig, a Londoner, obliged with a six-pounder. The publicity picture of Doig and his fish, cannily taken with Tower Bridge in the background, even though the fish was caught upstream at Chertsey, proved a winner. It put the project on the map. In 1993, 338 fish were counted in — an all-time high. Three years later, anglers took 34 fish in the season — another high.
But after that, returns collapsed abruptly. No fish has fallen to an angler since 1999. The project faded from public sight.
Potential reasons are legion. Up to 1994, young fish were released into the lower Thames and that is where the returning adults were counted. From 1995, the fish were released over potential breeding grounds far upstream in the Kennet and to get back there, the fish had to negotiate 70 more miles of river hazards.
Water quality in the Kennet has plummeted in recent years. The Kennet and the Thames have been hit by a series of droughts since the mid-1990s. Abstraction for housing and industry has soared, reducing their flows still further.
Long, hot summers have warmed remaining water, lowering the oxygen content at the very time the salmon, which need lots of oxygen, were trying to get upstream. A series of freak summer storms has flushed sewage into the water.
No one can point the finger for certain at any one cause — not even the storm pollution of August 2004 that killed fish of many kinds downstream from the capital. But as returns dwindle, so does hope — and with it the justification for pouring large sums into a dream that maybe came before its time.
Come 2009, Londoners may have to look elsewhere for their environmental credentials. Salmon anglers will be doing likewise for their sport.
Brian Clarke’s fishing column appears on the first Monday of each month.
The EA's own action plan also talks of:
There is no known natural salmon production in the River. A run of returning adult salmon must be maintained in order to continue the positive environmental benefits of the scheme and to stimulate a natural breeding population. The return in recent years has been poor and despite introducing early and late running stocks the majority of the run occurs when environmental conditions are most challenging.
Issues of flow and abstraction have a major affect on the salmon population in the freshwater river both through flows for migration and entrainment of juveniles.
Recent years have shown high catches of Thames salmon by the Irish drift net fishery. Reports have also been received of salmon being caught in the Thames estuary by commercial fishermen. These apparent increases in exploitation have coincided with poor returns to the freshwater Thames.
tweedcast: Price of 1 1/2 inch black and yellow tosh aluminum tubes just went up Graham.
Feb 3, 2015 18:39:15 GMT
tweedcast: Price of Black and Yellow plain Tosh 1 1/2 inch aluminum tubes with 3 inch wings just went up Graham. Malcolm
Feb 3, 2015 18:41:27 GMT
tweed ghillie: can anyone clarify the new law about returning salmon dead or alive,,,does it include the killing of sea trout someone point me in the right direction
Feb 14, 2015 12:05:56 GMT
159may: Do you still have the hrady swift reel and what is the line capacity
May 26, 2015 21:30:14 GMT
howardtf: Hi, only just joined the forum and I am looking for a used AirFlow airlite 13ft salmon rods ta reasonable price. I only use a 13ft occasionally and I have been reading the reports and the older version of the Airflow airlite seems to meet my needs/budget
Jul 16, 2015 18:05:13 GMT
loggerdog: Hello Sinktip. I used to fish Cortachy Castle/Downie Park many Moons ago. Live in Canada now. I talk regularly with StincharLad and he suggested that I make contact with you. e-mail is email@example.com. Look forward to a "Blether"!
Feb 17, 2016 19:54:27 GMT
tweedcast: Hi, I have not been on the forum for a long time, will be more active this year. Friend is searching for a beat map of Balmakewan on North Esk. An assistance greatly appreciated. Malcolm
May 9, 2016 18:57:03 GMT
uist: Hi everyone, new boy here. I have been looking at fluorocarbon vs other leaders. However a guide in Tampa for tarpon he swears by Fluro and the San Diego Jam a knot.
Nov 17, 2017 16:29:16 GMT
bennytfly: I think it’s time for a change baileyoh
Nov 25, 2019 19:55:13 GMT